Built for people who write code

Most automation tools treat code as an escape hatch you reach for when the pretty boxes run out. Pipedream inverts that. A workflow is a sequence of steps, and any step can be a prebuilt app action or a code block you write in Node.js, Python, Go, or Bash, with npm and PyPI packages available inline. The visual layer is there, but the language of the platform is code.

That framing decides who loves it. If you can write a few lines of JavaScript to reshape an API response, Pipedream feels less like a toy and more like serverless functions with 2,700-plus integrations and auth already handled. You are not learning a proprietary formula syntax; you are writing the language you already know, in a browser, with the OAuth plumbing done for you.

Credits are compute, not steps

Pipedream's meter confuses people until they see the unit. One credit equals 30 seconds of compute at 256MB of memory. You are billed for how long your workflow runs, not how many actions it contains. A workflow that finishes in eight seconds costs a fraction of one that grinds for 45, no matter how many steps either one has.

This is a genuinely different bet from n8n's per-execution model or Zapier's per-task model, and it cuts both ways. Short, snappy workflows are dirt cheap. Anything that waits on a slow external API, processes large files, or runs heavy loops will eat credits faster than a step-based tool would, because the clock is running the whole time. Before you commit, look at your slowest workflow, not your simplest one.

Pricing, checked August 2026

Checked on Pipedream's pricing page in August 2026:

• Free: 100 credits per day (they reset daily, not monthly), 3 active workflows, 3 connected accounts, and 1M AI tokens.
• Basic: $45/month, with a higher credit ceiling and more connected accounts.
• Advanced: $74/month, adding unlimited workflow testing, GitHub sync, and premium app connections.
• Connect: $150/month, aimed at embedding Pipedream's connectors and user auth inside your own product.

The free tier deserves a callout. A daily reset of 100 credits is roughly 50 minutes of compute a day for nothing, and three real workflows is enough to run a small side project indefinitely. Very few automation platforms give away that much. Where the free plan pinches is the 3-workflow cap, not the compute.

The Workday question

Here is the fact a feature comparison will not tell you: Pipedream was acquired by Workday in 2025, and as of August 2026 the self-serve pricing above is confirmed intact only through June 2026's terms, with no long-term guarantee published beyond that. Acquisitions of developer tools have a pattern. Sometimes nothing changes for years; sometimes the free tier thins and the focus shifts to enterprise.

None of that is a reason to avoid Pipedream today. It is a reason to keep your workflows portable: they are just code and config, so export them, keep them in your GitHub sync if you are on Advanced, and don't build a business-critical process you could not rebuild elsewhere in a weekend. That is good hygiene on any hosted platform, and doubly so on one that just changed owners.

Limitations

The credit-as-time model is the single biggest thing to watch, and it punishes exactly the workflows people forget to test: long-polling triggers, large file processing, anything that sits waiting on a sluggish third-party API. Cost becomes hard to predict when runtime is variable.

It is also not the tool for a non-developer. Strip away the code steps and Pipedream is thinner than Zapier on pure point-and-click depth, and its polish for someone who never wants to see a bracket is lower. The audience is clear: this is a developer's automation platform that happens to have a UI, not a no-code product that happens to allow code.

Verdict

Pipedream is the pick for a developer who wants serverless-style automation without standing up their own functions, auth, and integration layer. The free tier alone is worth an afternoon: it is generous enough to run a genuine project, and writing real Node or Python in a step feels natural rather than bolted on. For fast, event-driven workflows the credit model is cheaper than most rivals.

Skip it if you are non-technical, or if your workflows are long-running and compute-heavy, where the runtime meter turns against you and a per-task or per-execution tool is more predictable. In the first case, use Zapier; in the second, self-host n8n and stop watching a clock. And if the Workday ownership makes you uneasy, an open-source platform you control, like Activepieces, removes that variable entirely.